Make vs n8n vs Zapier vs Lindy vs Pipedream — 15 platforms compared with real 2026 pricing. Personalized top-3 picks. No email gate.
Pick all that apply.
Each platform measures volume differently (tasks/operations/executions) — pick the closest range. This is the #1 cost driver.
All-in (platform fee + any add-ons / overages).
Be honest. This is the biggest reason teams pick wrong.
And how many people will build / edit workflows?
Optional — flag deal-breakers.
Based on what you told us — here's where to start.
It depends on your volume, team skill, and budget. Make is the best balance of no-code + power at SMB scale. Zapier has the most integrations (8,000+) but is the most expensive per task. n8n is the cheapest at high volume if you can self-host. The picker scores all 15 platforms against your specific inputs.
15 platforms: Make, n8n, Zapier, Lindy, Pipedream, Relay.app, Workato, Tray.io, Activepieces, Bardeen, Latenode, IFTTT, Power Automate, Pipefy, and Cassidy.
The picker asks how many editors will build workflows. For per-seat platforms (Power Automate $15/user, Pipefy $19/user, Cassidy $40/seat, Bardeen $10/user), the result card shows the seat math line — e.g. "12 editors × $15/seat = +$180/mo" — so the total cost reflects reality.
Yes. n8n and Activepieces self-hosted aren't free — the picker estimates VPS cost ($5–80/mo) and admin overhead (~2–4 hrs/mo) so you can compare honestly against cloud platforms.
Self-hosted n8n is the cheapest at 50K+ executions/month (~$70 VPS + admin time vs $1,500+ on Zapier). For cloud-only, Make and Pipedream usually win at mid-volume. Use the picker to model your specific volume.
Make counts each module run as an operation, Zapier counts each action step as a task, n8n counts full workflow executions. A 5-step workflow run 10K times = 50K ops on Make, 50K tasks on Zapier, but only 10K executions on n8n. The picker surfaces this so you size the plan correctly.